From Problem-Solving to Possibility-Thinking: Reframing Your Strategic Planning
Most strategic planning sessions start with problem identification. What is wrong? What needs fixing? What gaps exist? What threats loom? This approach seems logical. After all, if you fix problems, your organization improves. But problem-focused planning creates problem-focused organizations. You get better at identifying what is broken while missing what is possible.
The language you use shapes the future you create. When you ask "What is our biggest problem?" you get problems. When you ask "What possibility excites us?" you get possibility. The first question leads to defensive thinking. The second opens creative thinking. Both are valid questions, but starting with problems limits what you can imagine.
Problem-focused planning produces incremental improvements at best. You identify weaknesses and work to eliminate them. You spot threats and build defenses. You find inefficiencies and optimize them. This approach keeps you competitive but rarely creates breakthrough results. You become slightly better at what you already do rather than discovering what you could become.
Possibility-thinking starts from a different place. Instead of asking what needs fixing, you ask what could be created. Instead of analyzing gaps, you explore potential. Instead of defending against threats, you imagine opportunities. This shift feels risky because possibility has no guarantee. But neither does problem-solving. Fixing problems does not ensure success, and defending against threats does not create growth.
Here is how the shift looks in practice. Traditional planning asks "How do we reduce customer complaints?" Possibility planning asks "What would remarkable customer experience look like?" The first leads to fewer problems. The second leads to transformation. Traditional planning asks "How do we cut costs?" Possibility planning asks "How might we create more value with existing resources?" Different questions produce different strategies.
Start your strategic conversations with possibility. Before listing problems, explore what you want to create. Before analyzing weaknesses, discuss strengths you could leverage. Before identifying threats, imagine opportunities you could pursue. This does not mean ignoring problems. It means starting from aspiration rather than from deficit.
Ask your team "What would be possible if we were not constrained by current limitations?" This question frees thinking from incremental improvements. People start imagining what they really want rather than what seems realistic. Later you can apply reality checks, but starting with possibility expands the solution space.
Facilitate discovery by asking "What are we already doing that shows us this possibility?" Connect future vision to current capability. When people see that seeds of the future already exist in the present, possibility feels achievable rather than fantastical. You build on actual strengths rather than inventing new capabilities from scratch.
Possibility-thinking changes how you handle challenges. When problems arise, you can ask "What opportunity does this challenge create?" A customer complaint reveals an unmet need you could address. A competitive threat pushes you to innovate. A resource constraint forces creative thinking. Reframing problems as possibilities changes your response from reactive to creative.
The energy in possibility conversations differs dramatically from problem conversations. Problem discussions drain energy. People feel defensive, frustrated, or overwhelmed. Possibility discussions generate energy. People feel engaged, creative, and hopeful. This energy difference matters because strategic plans require sustained effort to implement. Plans born from inspiration get more commitment than plans born from problem lists.
Organizations built on possibility-thinking attract different talent. People want to build something meaningful more than fix something broken. They want to contribute to creating a better future more than defending against threats. Purpose-driven individuals gravitate toward organizations focused on possibility.
Your strategic plan should include both possibility and pragmatism. After exploring possibilities, you must address real constraints, assess capabilities, and plan practically. But the sequence matters. Starting with possibility and then getting practical produces better strategies than starting with problems and hoping for breakthrough.
This approach requires courage. Problem-solving feels safer because you address known issues. Possibility-thinking feels riskier because you venture into unknown territory. But the real risk is playing it safe. In rapidly changing environments, incremental improvement means falling behind while others leap forward.
Practice possibility-thinking in smaller settings first. In team meetings, replace the agenda item "Problems to solve" with "Possibilities to explore." In project planning, ask "What would success beyond our expectations look like?" before asking "What could go wrong?" Build the muscle of starting with possibility before bringing it to strategic planning.
Your language reveals your mindset. Listen to how you and your team talk. How often do you say "problem" versus "opportunity"? How often do you focus on what is wrong versus what could be? How often do you discuss threats versus possibilities? Shift your language, and you shift your thinking. Shift your thinking, and you shift your reality.
Strategic planning should energize your organization, not exhaust it. Possibility-focused planning creates commitment because people helped envision the future. It generates creativity because people are not constrained by current problems. It builds momentum because people want to move toward something compelling rather than away from something painful.
Discover how to transform your strategic planning process in Supercharge: A New Playbook for Leadership. Get your hardcover or paperback copy today at www.davidtnorman.com/shop.
